Friday, July 31, 2009

Florida: Surviving pig abused by Robert Adisano gets new home at sanctuary

FLORIDA -- A pig the Florida Keys Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals rescued in March after its owner was charged with fatally abusing another pig on Duval Street has found a new home.

Sunshine, as its rescuers named it, is now living comfortably at the Monroe County Sheriff's Office Animal Farm, said SPCA employee Chuck Best.

"He's fully recovered and doing well," Best said Thursday. "We knew it couldn't be released to the wild. All his injuries are healed and he's eating well."


Sunshine was seized from the Key West residence of Robert Anthony Adisano, 25, on March 12, the day after he was charged with killing another pig by dragging it down Duval Street, reports say.

Adisano on Monday was ordered to pay $500 in fines stemming from Monroe County animal abuse ordinances that Best filed when he rescued Sunshine, he said. Adisano still faces a felony third-degree animal cruelty charge from the Duval Street incident and his trial date tentatively is set for Sept. 14, Assistant State Attorney Mark Wilson said.

In that incident, a police officer reportedly saw Adisano dragging a pig on a leash in the 300 block of Duval Street; Harriet was on her back, being raked down the street over broken glass, reports say. Her nose and mouth were bleeding when she died of internal injuries a short time later while in the care of the SPCA, Best said.

Adisano told police he had come from a bar, where he was using Harriet to meet women, reports say.


The day after Harriet died, Best removed Sunshine from Adisano's residence and began nursing the pig back to health. Sunshine was being kept in a small cage in "deplorable" conditions and was suffering from lacerations and open wounds when rescued, Best said.

"Sunshine is very social," Best said. "He loves back rubs, loves taking baths and loves playing in the pool."

(Keys News - July 31, 2009)

Earlier:

Wednesday, July 29, 2009

Nebraska: Acea Schomaker, 21, pleads guilty to stuffing his kitten in a box and blowing marijuana smoke into it

NEBRASKA -- Acea Schomaker, the Nebraska man who was cited in March for placing a cat in a makeshift marijuana bong, pleaded guilty Monday to animal cruelty charges in the incident.

Schomaker, who recently turned 21, also pleaded guilty to charges of marijuana possession and being in possession of alcohol while he was still a minor, the Lincoln Journal Star reported.


Schomaker originally pleaded not guilty to animal cruelty charges in April and has said his intention was not to harm the cat, a six-month-old female named Shadow, but [supposedly] to calm her.

Shadow, he said, had behavioral problems that included biting and scratching people. After hearing stories of animals being calmed when humans blew marijuana smoke in their faces, he decided to do them one better and stuffed her inside the smoking device.

Authorities came to Schomaker’s residence after responding to a domestic disturbance call (none of the stories detail who made the call or why).  However, when sheriff’s deputies arrived, they caught Schomaker smoking weed from the “boxlike contraption that had the cat stuffed inside its 12-inch by 6-inch base" (about the size of a shoebox).


Schomaker was ticketed on suspicion of misdemeanor animal cruelty, and his girlfriend, Marissa Vieux, 23, was also ticketed for animal cruelty because she didn’t try to stop Schomaker.

Schomaker was so pleased with himself he told police he had done this THREE TIMES already to the poor kitten.

One of the sheriff's deputies involved in the case said Shadow was shaking when she was removed from the device and that part of her body appeared to be covered in urine and feces.


"This cat was just dazed," Sgt. Andy Stebbing said. "She was on the front seat of the cop car, wrapped in a blanket, and never moved all the way to the humane society."

The cat was taken to a Lincoln, Neb., animal shelter, where she was reportedly in good condition after the effects of the marijuana wore off.


Schomaker will return to court Sept. 18 for sentencing; he could face up to a year in jail, according to the Journal Star.

(LA Times blog - July 28, 2009)

Tuesday, July 28, 2009

Michigan: Owner of Dearborn home, Kenneth Lang Jr., filled with dead and dying Chihuahuas filed for bankruptcy in 2006, asked to keep 3 dogs

MICHIGAN -- Kenneth Lang Jr. was on social security, obsessed with Chihuahuas and flat broke.

That combination led to the scene last week in Dearborn where authorities removed more than 100 living Chihuahuas from Lang's Orchard Avenue home, as well as more than 150 frozen dead dogs wrapped in plastic.


The Detroit News reports that Lang filed for bankruptcy in 2006, listing $73,663 in debts and requesting he be allowed to hold on to "three dogs" valued at $25.

Lang also disclosed a $25 a month expense for pet care, which he listed as "regular expenses from the operation of business, profession, or farm."

In 2006, Lang was making $664 a month from unemployment benefits and $860 from Social Security disability payments.

  
 
 

Lang was taken to a hospital and his attorney yesterday said his client suffered from Obsessive Compulsive Disorder.

Pursuing criminal charges would be a waste or resources, the attorney said. "That would be us treating humans worse than we treat animals."

(MLive - July 27, 2009)

Saturday, July 25, 2009

Texas: Convicted animal hoarder Brenda Luellen says from jail, "I just love taking care of Shih Tzus"

TEXAS -- Brenda Luellen (aka Brenda Kenney) is not adjusting well to life in jail.

A month into her one-year sentence, Luellen, 57, spent a week in isolation in a medical cell. Inmates have picked on her, she says, and the cold in the jail makes her arthritic joints ache.

"I've never been so cruelly treated in my whole life," Luellen said during a jailhouse interview July 8.

Luellen came to reluctant prominence in San Angelo last year as city authorities went to her home in The Bluffs and took away dogs by the dozen.


This year saw a virtual replay, with more than 50 of the tiny shih tzu dogs for which Luellen has a seemingly irresistible predilection removed in May after neighbors complained of rank smells coming from her property and expressed concern about unhealthy conditions.

On June 19, after a brief trial in Tom Green County Court-at-Law at which she represented herself rather than hiring a lawyer, Luellen was sentenced by Judge Penny Roberts to a year in jail, the maximum jail term for the misdemeanor charge, regarding the 2008 case.

Luellen pleaded not guilty Thursday to a health code violation and a violation of the city's new pet ordinance in connection with other complaints filed this May.

Lt. Bill Fiveash, the county sheriff's spokesman, said jail workers did check into Luellen's complaints but couldn't find any evidence to support them.

"They didn't physically hurt her," Fiveash said, "but maybe they shunned her. They probably did."

For years, Luellen and Arthur Kenney, the man she has lived with for more than 30 years, have been a mystery to neighbors and an enigma to her family.

Luellen believes that all she is guilty of is wanting to raise dogs and be left alone.

******************

Her older sister, Sandra Harkey of Tuscola, says she remembers growing up with Luellen in Paint Rock. The two grew apart as they grew older, and Luellen eventually seemed to want little to do with her sister or her parents.

"I love her, but I don't like her," Harkey said. "I don't understand her."

Before Luellen moved to San Angelo, she traveled the country working as a nurse's aide. In the 1970s, she met Arthur Kenney, a Korean War veteran who drove trucks for a living in Washington state. The two began living together.

Luellen said she owned a few dogs at the end of their time in Washington.

Arthur Kenney

Harkey and her cousin Loyd Joiner of Paint Rock said they remember Luellen having pets as a child. Years later, they visited the house on Kingsbridge Drive in San Angelo. As the neighborhood grew, Luellen and Kenney installed surveillance cameras around their porch and covered the windows with dark curtains. Visitors are rare.

Family members said they don't have much contact with Luellen, but do remember dogs overrunning the house on Kingsbridge. Loyd Joiner recalled a recent visit. "I was in there for a little bit, but I had to get out" because of the odor, he said.

******************

Luellen said she and Kenney made the move to The Bluffs because it was quiet. Before then, the family lived near in a house near Sunset Mall, where Luellen bred and sold dachshunds and cocker spaniels.

"I didn't have a whole lot (of dogs) at first," Luellen said, estimating the number at less than a dozen. After she retired from being a nurse's aid, her household became home for an increasing number of dogs, some she says that people brought her to rehabilitate.


"I just love taking care of them," she said. "They have so much to give: so much love, and so much compassion." When she raised her first shih tzu, Luellen said, she fell in love.

Jenie Wilson, a Shih Tzu & Furbabies Rescue volunteer, said she does not discount Luellen's passion for the dogs but said just being passionate isn't enough.

"I can't say whether or not she loved her animals, but they were not cared for in a manner that was conducive to good health," Wilson said.

Of the dogs removed from Luellen's house in the 2008 raid, one had a broken jaw, several had broken bones in their paws, and three had to have eyes surgically removed, Wilson said. On some, the nails had ingrown into the foot pads. Urine stains showed on their skin even after the animals were shaved.

"There was some abuse and some obvious neglect in the home," Wilson said. "It can become too much for one person to handle." Based on the length of the nails and hair, she said, it appeared the dogs had not been properly groomed in years.


Caring for dogs became her life and all she had to look forward to in her retirement, Luellen said. She had dogs on rotation and would bathe several animals a day, and says that although she could not get to all of them, she simply wanted to have that many. She sold animals from her home at one time, she said, but has not been in business for more than a year.

******************

Scott Blanton, a veterinarian with Green Meadows Veterinary Hospital, said Luellen treats her animals more like pets than a typical dog breeder does.

Over the years, Luellen would occasionally bring dogs to his clinic with ear or eye problems, ailments to which shih tzu dogs are naturally prone, Blanton said. Never in his examinations did an animal appear mistreated.

"She tried the best she could," Blanton said.

Blanton said he remembers Luellen weeping when one of her puppies died, and her grief seemed genuine to him.


Blanton said he has not seen Luellen since about a month before the 2008 raid. Employees at the his clinic were shocked when they heard about at the conditions at Luellen's home after the raid. "I've never seen her abuse any of those animals," he said, but "they were in an abusive situation."

******************

Luellen and Kenney came to public prominence through the legal system. Last year in San Angelo Municipal Court, the two pleaded no contest to a charge of "waste in pens or yard" and a residential zoning violation, according to court records. They paid a total of $555 in fines and court fees for those offenses.

Luellen is in jail now because she was also convicted of animal cruelty for the 2008 case - which took a year to come to court - sentenced to a year in jail and ordered to pay $18,625 in restitution to the city and a dog rescue group.

Arthur Kenney's appearance in court July 17 to face animal cruelty charges was canceled - prosecutors dismissed the charges, saying they concluded that Luellen was the main culprit in the case and adding that they didn't believe Kenney fully understands what is going on around him.

Even though she sold dogs out of her home, Luellen insists it was not a puppy mill.

Income from the animals, which sold for $150 to $700, was just enough to care for the dogs, she said.

Their $353,000 home was purchased with Kenney's money, she said. 

She, Kenney and their two adult sons all receive monthly disability income. THE ENTIRE FAMILY IS ON PUBLIC ASSISTANCE WHILE SHE BREEDS AND SELLS DOGS FOR UNDECLARED INCOME.


According to the Tom Green County Appraisal District, the house was built in 2004. The 3,519-square-foot house and the land it sits on are valued at $353,800.

Andrew Siefker, a professor at Angelo State University who lives behind Luellen's house, said that while he wishes the situation had ended better, he enjoys sleeping through the night. He said his neighbors' dogs habitually were let out of the house into the fenced yard late at night, and their barking would set off a volley of barking throughout the neighborhood. Runoff from the backyard that borders his is still a concern for him, Siefker said.

Although he and his neighbor had strained relations, Siefker took no pleasure in seeing her go to jail for a year. He said he was surprised and thinks the punishment is "disproportionate to the crime."

Prosecutors have said they are pleased with that case's outcome.

In the one conversation he had with Luellen, he said he found her uncooperative, but that didn't stop him and other neighbors from trying to handle their problems civilly.

"I find it unfortunate we couldn't communicate with them. ... We couldn't resolve this as neighbors," Siefker said. "It wasn't for a lack of trying."


Luellen says she tried hard, too, when it came to her dogs.

A court official told her after the 2008 seizure that she could have dogs again, "as long as I took care of them," she said. That's what led Luellen to again own the dozens of shih tzus seized this year.

If Luellen believes she has done nothing wrong, she might continue to breed animals, said Dr. William Montgomery, a psychology professor at Angelo State University who has never met her.

A rough analogy would be the Mormon fundamentalists who, after encountering resistance in one state, move to another, Montgomery said.

"It sounds like they wanted to be left alone, to do their own thing," he said. "Unfortunately, their thing was disturbing other people."

Getting out is what Luellen now has in mind. After this is behind her family, she said, they intend to leave Texas so she can raise dogs and horses and not be bothered.

"I've always loved animals," she said, "and they can't take that away from me."

(Go San Angelo - July 25, 2009)

Earlier:

Friday, July 24, 2009

Kentucky: Wolf hybrids scrutinized after pet takes baby from crib

KENTUCKY -- Dakota, the animal that badly injured 3-day-old Alexander James Smith on Monday, is at the center of a now national discussion that isn’t likely to end soon.

Is she a bad dog who should be destroyed? Or is she a dog acting on a dog’s instinct and unfairly taking the blame for what was, essentially, human fault? And, now because of her complicated breed and background, has the matter become so incomprehensibly muddled that she is no longer considered a backyard dog at all?

When Michael Smith, Alexander’s father, spoke to the media Tuesday, he said Dakota was “a Native American Indian” breed and said the breeder told him the dog’s grandparentage as “90 percent wolf.”

Critics argue that hybrids are unpredictable and dangerous, that they make poor pets and that there is no rabies vaccine available for wolves or their hybrids. Proponents claim the hybrid wolf is a good companion and is useful in educating the public about wolves. Many claim “once you have had a wolf hybrid, you will never own a dog again.”

Mary Ann Zeigenfuse, a Lexington dog trainer and owner of Best Friends Obedience, said if Dakota is part wolf, she is no expert.

“If this is a wolf-hybrid, this is not a dog,” she said. “It is still partly undomesticated. It may, in some cases, have no fear of humans.”

When asked if she and loving pet owners could domesticate a wolf, she responded, “if I had 10,000 years.”

There have been numerous reports of wolf hybrids injuring people, sometimes fatally. In 2002 in Ballard County, Ky., a wolf hybrid killed a 5-year-old boy; the animal’s owner pleaded guilty to a charge of reckless homicide.

Janece Rollet, a certified canine behaviorist in Georgetown, Ky., is among the people who say that wolf hybrids are potential trouble. She said they are essentially wild animals.

A wolf hybrid “is not an animal you want living in your house,” Rollet said. “Because you’re dealing with the basic tenets, the basic behavior of a wolf, not the basic behavior of a dog.”

David Wise of Frankfort, Ky., is among those who defend wolf hybrids.

“It’s probably one of the most loyal animals I’ve ever had,” Wise said. “I had one for 15 years, and it was the most docile animal you ever had. He never once snapped at a child.”

So how does Wise respond to reports of wolf hybrids biting and injuring people?

“It’s all in how they’re raised,” Wise said. “When they’re pups, pups are going to be rough. But as they get older, you show ’em more affection than the roughhousing, and they’re gentle as a lamb. They’re no different than any other breed of dog in that respect.”

A matter of controversy

Michael Smith says they have had Dakota and Nikita, her sister, for four years — since they were pups. They got the dogs from a Michigan breeder.

But are Dakota, and her sister who still remains in the Smith home, wolf hybrids?

The dog breed itself is a matter of some controversy. Is it the same as a Carolina Dog or an American dingo?

Depends on who you ask.

Spokesmen for the American Kennel Club and United Kennel Club said Wednesday that those registry organizations do not recognize the Native American Indian dog as a breed.

However, do an Internet search and you will find sites that refer to Native American Indian dogs. According to Web sites devoted to the dog, there are only five breeders in the United States, and there’s much discussion about their position and whether they have any verifiable claim to a dog with a specific native American origin with wolf ancestry.

Apparently, even the legal status of the dog has been challenged by some Native Americans.

Sherman Jett, supervisor of Jessamine County, Ky., Animal Control, said he has never heard of a Native American Indian dog, nor has his predecessor. Beckey Reiter, director of Boone County, Ky., Animal Control, also said “that’s not a breed I’m aware of.”

Jett said he could not say with certainty what type of animal Dakota is. “I honestly don’t know,” he said.

There are animals known as Native American dogs, “but they do not contain wolf,” said Rollet. Native American dogs, she said, “are a combination of multiple, larger dogs: husky, German shepherd, malamute and so on.”

A classic mistake

Dr. Andrew “Butch” Schroyer from the Animal Care Clinic in Lexington said that in 25 years of practice, he has never seen nor treated this breed of dog.

That means it’s hard to talk about its predilections. Still, he added, if it is a wolf hybrid, it is unpredictable, which is not good in a pet. And, he cautioned, like any exotic pet, “just because you can have one, doesn’t mean you should have one.”

The disposition of the Native American Indian dog is being hotly defended this week.

Karen Markel, a breeder at Majestic View Kennels in Lowell, Mich., said that in general, Native American Indian dogs are social and get along well with children. “Any dog trainer will tell you it’s negligence” to leave a small child alone with any kind of canine, she said. “Of course the dog will suffer as a consequence.”

Ray Coppinger, a biology professor at Hampshire College who studies canine behavior, said the dog’s history — where it came from, what it has experienced — is exponentially more important than what breed it is. He’s seen similar incidents happen with dachshunds, he said.

Coppinger said that although what happened to the Smiths is tragic, it’s a relatively common problem.

The Smiths made a “classic mistake, out of ignorance, and now they’re suffering badly for it,” he said. Dogs like Dakota don’t recognize infants as people, Coppinger said. “It’s no more of an act of violence on the dog’s part,” he said, “than you eating a steak.”

(Seattle Times - July 23, 2009)

Earlier:

Texas: More charges filed against Brenda Luellen (Brenda Kenney) in San Angelo puppy mill case

TEXAS -- Further charges have been filed by the city against a woman already charged twice and serving jail time in a high-profile puppy mill case.

Brenda Luellen, who was convicted last month on an animal cruelty charge dating to April 2008, pleaded not guilty Thursday to a health code violation and a violation of the city's new pet ordinance in connection with other complaints filed in May.


Pretrial hearings are set for 9 a.m. Aug. 5, according to a municipal court official. Luellen, who was in jail and unavailable for comment, does not have an attorney listed to represent her in the new case.

A city legal official filed the complaints Wednesday, charging Luellen with keeping or harboring more than seven dogs without a valid multi-pet owner's permit, which is a violation under a recently passed city ordinance. She is also charged with keeping animals in a place that is "filthy, malodorous or unsanitary."

  

In May city officials removed more than 50 dogs from Leullen's home on Kingsbridge Drive. Luellen's jail sentence was imposed by County Court-at-Law Judge Penny Roberts for a violation in 2008.

This year's charges do not take evidence from last year's animal seizure into account, said Amie Hajovsky, a prosecutor with the city's legal department. She declined to comment on the charges.

Last year Luellen pleaded no contest to a charge of "waste in pens or yard" and paid $195 in fine and court costs, according to court administrator Linda Gossett. Luellen also pleaded no contest to a second residential zoning violation and paid $360 in fine and court costs.


The set fine amount for conviction under the two charges filed Wednesday is $390. If Luellen challenges the charges in court, the penalties could be higher.

"If they go to trial, that figure can change," Gossett said. If convicted, the health code violation is punishable by a fine up to $500. If the court determines the violation was done recklessly, the fine can be as much as $2,000.

Violating the multiple-pet ownership ordinance could result in a fine of up to $500.

(Standard Times - July 24, 2009)

Earlier:

Thursday, July 23, 2009

West Virginia: Clint Casto pleaded not guilty to animal cruelty after a dead horse and a horse "near death" found on his property

WEST VIRGINIA -- A man from Kanawha County indicted on animal cruelty charges was in court for his arraignment on Thursday.

Clint Casto, 30, of 913 Amherst Drive, was arrested Monday after a Kanawha County humane officer found a dead horse almost complete decomposed in a stall on Casto's property along Five Mile Hollow near Big Chimney. 

A second horse was in the next stall and was completely emaciated and barely able to stand, according to a complaint filed with the Kanawha County Magistrate Court.

Kanawha County humane officer Johnny Brotherton said in the complaint that there was no food or water in the stalls and there didn't appear to have been any for a long time.

In court, Casto pleaded not guilty to the charges. He is currently out of jail on a $25,000 bond. His trial is set for October 1.

Casto was apparently a candidate for the state House of Delegates last year.

(WSAZ - July 23, 2009)