Showing posts with label urban chickens. Show all posts
Showing posts with label urban chickens. Show all posts

Sunday, March 23, 2014

Urban chicken problems come home to roost

CALIFORNIA -- On any given day, more than 80 roosters can be seen running roughshod on a suburban street just north of downtown.

To the south, in Curtis Park, a backyard chicken owner spent hours last week searching for two wayward chickens that leaped out of her backyard.

Angelina Jhai, 9, of Grass Valley, whose father works for Animal
Place sanctuary, waits for people to adopt hens Saturday at
Western Ranch & Pet Supply in Vacaville. As chicken coops
 have become chiq in cities, bird health issues arise.

Read more here: http://www.sacbee.com/2014/03/23/6260405_a6260402/urban-chicken-problems-come-home.html#storylink=cpy

And officials at the city’s animal shelter say area chicken owners are not licensing their chickens, which costs the city money every time it must deal with a chicken-related animal control call.

These issues are among the fallout of a 2011 city ordinance that made it possible for Sacramentans to keep up to three hens in their backyard. That ordinance is part of a national trend where urban backyard chicken ownership has become popular.

The impact has been rising costs for city shelters and has resulted in the releasing of roosters into the cityscape – or their slaughter – when owners realize that the young bird they own is a male. One chicken rescue organization – Chicken Run Rescue – in Minneapolis took in 500 urban chickens in 2012.

Also of concern is that chickens can harbor diseases like salmonella.

In Sacramento, most owners of backyard chickens are not licensing their birds or getting permits for coops as required by the ordinance, said Gina Knepp, animal care manager at the city’s Front Street shelter. Chickens require a dedicated coop where birds can be safe from the elements and predators in the evening, and ample yard space to range during the day.

In 2012, 142 permits were issued for coops and 445 hen licenses were purchased, said Knepp. But she believes that the backyard chicken population is much larger.

“We’re not seeing a lot of compliance with chickens,” said Knepp. Rooster ownership is illegal. The city levies a $100 fine for keeping an unlicensed chicken.

The city licensing fees are $10 a year per chicken, which help defray the costs incurred when animal control investigates complaints about noise or excessive bird numbers. There is also a $15 annual coop fee.

The loss of that revenue stream means the shelter cannot adequately deal with growing populations of abandoned roosters and hens.

A large population that lives near the American River Parkway on the 500 block of Columbus Avenue is “a good example of what happens when someone dumps a few hens,” she said.

On that block, the clarion call of roosters is the order of the day. Several food bowls are strewn in an open lot on the street, suggesting their presence is welcome.

“This has been a chronic problem for years. No one claims ownership, but people feed them,” said Knepp.

“We’ve been out netting birds but the problem continues to grow. There is some open space between the houses and large trees for roosting,” Knepp said. “We can’t exactly go out and shoot them, and netting is time-consuming and not an efficient use of our animal control officer time.”


Annie Gustavsen, center, an intern with Animal Place sanctuary, loads
hens along with Roni Seabury, right, also with Animal Place, as the
chickens are adopted Saturday in Vacaville.

Read more here: http://www.sacbee.com/2014/03/23/6260405_a6260404/urban-chicken-problems-come-home.html#storylink=cpy


Abandoned chickens can also be found elsewhere, including Fair Oaks park, said Dave Dickinson, director of animal care for the Sacramento County Animal Shelter.

“When people get tired of their chickens, they take them out there and think it’s OK to abandon them there,” said Dickinson. “There are as many as 100 birds in the area.”

Commercial chicken farmers try to get rid of hens when they have reached a certain age – usually by the time they are 18 months old – when their egg-laying productivity drops. Some farmers allow their hens and rooster to go to rescue organizations.

A Butte County farmer will allow Animal Place, a regional rescue, to take 1,800 hens when he closes his egg farm . Local organizations like the Sacramento SPCA are helping Animal Place find new homes for the birds and has agreed to take an initial delivery of 20 hens, said Rick Johnson, CEO of the Sacramento SPCA. The shelter currently has 72 chickens awaiting adoption.

UC Davis professor Asli Mete urges caution for would-be chicken owners. Chickens often carry salmonella and other diseases that can spread to humans or pets. Healthy backyard chickens that interact with wild birds can contract diseases from them.

Humans can get salmonella by handling birds or their eggs, as well as from cooking eggs that have the bacterium, he said.

“Chickens can carry salmonella without showing any (signs of) disease,” said Mete, professor of clinical pathology. He recommends that people wash their hands every time they handle a bird.

Chicken owners with children or who live with elderly or people with suppressed immune systems should have their birds checked for the disease, said Mete.

Testing is available at the California Animal Health and Food Safety Lab at UC Davis, he said.

The lab studied the cause of death in backyard birds over the last five years. It examined 1,301 dead backyard chickens and found that a third of the deaths were due to viral diseases like Marek’s disease, which affects chickens and not humans. Bacterial infections accounted for 23 percent of backyard chicken deaths. The E. coli bacterium was the largest cause of bacterial death found in backyard chickens, the study said.

Curtis Park resident Mary Anne Moore is learning that keeping chickens is no care-free pursuit.
Caring for her two hens requires wing clipping and dusting the birds for mite prevention. The birds are rescues from a prior owner.


Over 1,000 chickens were rescued by Animal Place
sanctuary  from a Chico farm, and the first group of
400 were adopted Saturday in Vacaville.

Read more here: http://www.sacbee.com/2014/03/23/6260405_a6260403/urban-chicken-problems-come-home.html#storylink=cpy


“It’s $200 for a vet to come out to your house and that is before he even looks at the birds,” said Moore. “So, you can easily end up with the world’s most expensive egg.”

Recently, Moore spent several days searching for the hens after they hopped a fence. Both chickens were found.

And she had to fence in the birds from the rest of the backyard. “If you let them free range, they will eat anything green,” she said.

“If you do not want to put some time and education into it, I’d say don’t do it,” Moore said.

(Sacramento Bee - Mar. 23, 2014)

Sunday, November 20, 2011

Much ado-dle-doo about noisy birds

MAINE -- For Julie Sutherland there was no choice: If she didn’t take the 25 roosters home, they would become someone’s dinner.

The time to act came in June, when she overheard a comment at a farm store in Portland where she buys grain for her horses.

“He said he wanted to make kabobs out of them,” Sutherland said this week.

So, she boxed them up and took them to her farm on Ledge Hill Road in Raymond.


For her neighbor Wayne Gelston, that’s when life at home became unbearable.

“I have to sleep with earplugs in,” said Gelston, who lives diagonally across the street from Sutherland. “They crow all day long. They never stop.”

Gelston played a recording of the roosters to the town’s select board at a meeting last month. On Tuesday, the board will consider amending its barking-dog ordinance to apply to all noisy animals, which would enable the town to fine their owners for infractions.

Sutherland, however, is in no immediate danger of being penalized. For the past few weeks, she has kept the now-grown roosters in a storage room in her barn, where they can’t be heard from outside.

She put the birds there to protect them from a wild dog that’s been stalking the neighborhood and has already killed about half of the flock. Once the dog is caught, she said, the birds will be back in the yard.

On a recent afternoon, the 13 roosters that remain were hopping up and down two shelving units in the barn, cocking their heads and crowing. Sutherland said she can tell some apart by the pitch of their crows alone. She has names for most of them.


There are two black roosters, Boss and Boss’ brother. The white ones are Snow and Snowball. Ruby and Red have feathers the color of rust, and Handsome and The Gimp are flecked with blue.

Sutherland, 50, moved to Raymond from Yarmouth last year with her boyfriend, two horses, four cats and two dogs. “We just wanted to get a little farther out,” she said.

She thinks noises from farm animals should be an accepted part of rural life.

“This is country,” Sutherland said.

The same sentiment was expressed at a public hearing in Cape Elizabeth on Monday. Town councilors there also are considering a proposal to fine owners of noisy farm animals.

About 10 residents spoke against the proposal at the hearing, and the council decided to continue the discussion in a workshop.

For Gelston, 59, the regulations are needed for retaining the little luxuries in life.


A salesman for a food distributor, Gelston said he just wants to sleep past 7 a.m. on his days off from work. He wants to garden and sit on his porch with his wife. Those are activities he can’t enjoy when the roosters are around.

“We leave the house just to get away from it,” he said.

Town staff put together two proposed ordinances for the select board to consider at its 7 p.m. meeting Tuesday. Neither prohibits anyone in Raymond from owning a rooster. The proposed penalties for violating the noise ordinance range from a written warning for a first offense to a maximum of $500 for multiple offenses.

If an ordinance is adopted, Gelston assures that he won’t be shy about lodging complaints.

“If it gets like this again, I’ll call every day,” he said. “I won’t give up.”

(Press Herald - November 19, 2011)

Thursday, September 8, 2011

Florida: Timothy and Diane Prosser insist they just want to raise chickens (yet he was charged with cockfighting in 2016)

2016 update to story: Florida: No animals allowed for Timothy Prosser charged in cockfighting bust, judge says


FLORIDA -- Timothy and Diane Prosser simply want to raise their flock of chickens in peace so they can eat the eggs and watch their three kids show them at the county fair.

The Prossers's landlord simply wants the city to drop its case accusing him of illegally allowing the fowl on his property, a problem he said is the responsibility of his otherwise upstanding tenants.

The city simply wants the Prossers and their landlord to pay fines levied against them and get rid of the birds.

Timothy Prosser Sr. discusses neighbors' complaints
about the chickens he keeps penned in the
backyard of his home off Melody Ln in North
Jacksonville. Also pictured is Prosser's wife Diane.

And the chickens? They've yet to voice an opinion on the matter, though they can be a rather boisterous bunch.

The controversy began about three months ago when city code enforcement officials, answering neighborhood complaints, began citing the Prossers for violating an ordinance that prohibits poultry on their property. Justin Hart also got cited as the owner of the land at 7023 Melody Lane, just northwest of Interstate 295 and U.S. 1.

Poultry is allowed in property zoned for agricultural or rural residential use, where chickens and other animals can be kept with restrictions. The third of an acre where the Prossers' birds are penned is neither.

The Prossers have refused to pay the mounting fines — now up to $2,200 — claiming Hart said it was OK for them to move to the property with the chickens from a smaller plot in Marietta. They said they told Hart about being cited and believed he would take care of the problem.

“I’m a country boy,” said Timothy Prosser, 33, a burly, balding man with a strong Southern drawl. “I don’t let my chickens run free. They crow, but I can’t do nothing about that.”

A reporter’s trip to the property this week indeed found about 85 of the healthy-looking, booming birds separated in about 30 backyard pens. Prosser said he raises some and also rescues unwanted and sickly chickens, which he periodically sells after nursing them back to health.

Prosser, a repo man, said his wife uses the eggs for breakfast. He also believes teaching his children how to care for the birds keeps them busy and out of trouble. They’ve shown them in the Bradford County fair, once winning third place.

The Prossers' kids — Dakota, 9, Alisha, 7 and Timothy Jr., 4 — are quite fond of their pets.

“I love ’em,” Dakota said.

Dakota Prosser, 9, holds one of his family's chickens
among the backyard pens at his family's home off
Melody Lane in North Jacksonville.

Hart said he is unhappy that the city will not drop its case against him, even if he convinces the Prossers to get rid of the birds, which they don’t plan to do.

Hart said he first learned about the problem after being cited in early August — before he had been given the chance to remedy the problem. The Prossers said they had told Hart about their citations, which he denies.

Hart, who owns several dozen properties, said he didn’t know poultry was prohibited on the land and questioned why the city is making it such a big deal.

“I think the chickens should be left alone,” said Hart, 29. “They’re not bothering anybody.”

Hart is appealing his fine and a court hearing will be set, said Jason Teal, the chief assistant general counsel handling the case. The Prossers never sought to appeal the citations and refuse to pay their fines.

The Prosser family takes care of approximately 85
roosters and hens penned in the their backyard off
Melody Lane in North Jacksonville. The family's
landlord is being accused of allowing fowl to be
illegally kept on the property.

The city has dug in behind its decision to cite both parties, saying Hart is ultimately responsible for not getting the Prossers to obey the law. As for the Prossers, Teal said whether their care and use of the birds is well-intended, the ordinance code can’t be bent.

“There’s no good guy discount,” Teal said.

In the end, neither the Prossers nor Hart face being penned up as scofflaws since the violations are civil infractions. Dakota simply hopes the grown-ups can resolve the squabble so he and his pets can get on with life.

(Jacksonville.com - Sept 8, 2011)