Showing posts with label pointer. Show all posts
Showing posts with label pointer. Show all posts

Friday, July 28, 2017

Iowa: Man claims he loves his dog but left her locked inside hot car for half an hour outside Walmart

IOWA -- A man is being cited for animal neglect after leaving his dog in a hot car Friday morning.

Des Moines police responded to the Walmart on Southeast 14th Street shortly after 9:00 a.m.

 

Police say a man left his dog in the car for more than 30 minutes without water and cool air. It was 84 degrees at the time of the rescue, but Animal Control says inside of the car felt more like 94 degrees.

A Walmart customer called police about the dog and when officers arrived they found the older dog was in distress -- panting and shaking.

  
 

The dog’s owner says he regrets his actions.

Um, if you watch the video, he really didn't say he regretted his actions. He made excuses and claimed he'd just gone inside Walmart to get $20. That doesn't take 30 minutes, dude.

"Never mind I just gotta go to court and all that, I love my dog you shouldn’t leave them in there that long. If I didn’t need that $20 I wouldn’t have left her in there that long,” said the man.

 
 

The police did return the dog back to her owner for the time being, but they will be following up with the man about the animal’s care.

Animal Control officials say they receive upwards of three animal rescue calls like this a day.

VIDEO NEWS CLIP:


(WHOTV - July 21, 2017)

Friday, June 9, 2017

Ronald Kevin Mundy Jr. claims his dog is an "emotional therapy" pet so he's allowed to drag it onto a Delta flight. The "emotional therapy" dog proceeds to immediately maul Marlin Jackson's face. TWICE!

GEORGIA / CALIFORNIA -- A passenger on a Delta flight who was mauled in the face by a veteran's emotional support dog released harrowing photographs of his wounds before he received 28 stitches.

Marlin Termaine Jackson was sitting in the window seat on Delta flight 1430 from Atlanta, Georgia, to San Diego, California, on Sunday, when he was attacked by Ronald Mundy Jr's service dog, that he CLAIMS IS AN EMOTIONAL THERAPY PET.

Jackson was mauled twice, and suffered several lacerations on his face, including a 'puncture through the lip and gum', according to a statement released by his attorney J. Ross Massey.


Jackson was in the window seat, while the dog's owner, Ronald Kevin Mundy Jr. of Mills River, North Carolina, was sitting in the middle seat with his dog on his lap.

The dog, described as a Labrador retriever-pointer mix (that, until I see better photos of this dog, looks to me like a Pit Bull mix), began growling shortly after Jackson boarded the plane and sat down, witnesses said. 

  According to Bridget Maddox-Peoples, another passenger on the plane told her that Jackson asked the owner, 'Is this dog going to bite me?'

  'You could hear a dog growling and a bark and someone screamed 'I need help, there's a medical emergency.' The area was completely covered in blood,' Maddox-Peoples told Fox 5.
 

'The gentleman's face was completely bloody. His shirt was covered in blood,' Maddox-Peoples said. 'When he walked out, he had a cloth over his face. 

Mundy pulled his dog off Jackson's face, but the animal broke free and attacked him a second time, according to Massey.

The attack occurred before the plane took off, and Jackson was transported to the emergency room where he received 28 stitches.

Jackson, who is likely to be permanently scarred, is awaiting a consultation with a plastic surgeon, Massey said.

The attorney issued a statement on Thursday, saying: 'We understand and respect the importance of emotional support and service animals, especially for our nation's veterans.

'We are also concerned with Delta Air Lines' compliance with their policies to ensure the safety of all passengers. It is troubling that an airline would allow a dog of such substantial size to ride in a passenger's lap without a muzzle.

'Especially considering the dog and its owner were assigned a middle seat despite Delta Air Lines' policies that call for the re-accommodation of larger animals.'

According to Delta, the airline 'complies with the Air Carrier Access Act by allowing customers traveling with emotional support animals or psychiatric service animals to travel without charge' as long as they provide documentation.


Delta's website also says trained service dogs are allowed to be in the cabin without a kennel.

THIS IS NOT A 'SERVICE DOG'.

The dog was placed in a carrier and put on another flight with its owner, Delta said.

An unnamed witness told Fox 5 that Mundy was seen in the gate area cradling the dog in his arms, crying, and repeatedly saying, 'I know they're going to put him down.'

I doubt it. Unless he surrenders it to be euthanized, it's very difficult to order the destruction of a dog - unless it has killed someone.

Mundy was not charged in the incident.

MY THOUGHTS:

1. Ronald Mundy Jr. needs to be charged with reckless endangerment, owning a vicious dog and this dog should NEVER again be able to be labelled a "therapy pet" or "emotional therapy pet" or whatever nonsense they call these animals they want to drag everywhere with them.

2. Ronald Mundy Jr. needs to be sued out the wazoo for bringing a vicious onto a plane and allowing it to maul this man -- not just once, but TWICE the dog attacked him while Mundy just flailed around bawling about his therapy dog.

3. Delta Airlines should be sued out the wazoo for allowing these fake and semi-fake service animals onto their flights when the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) clearly says that "emotional therapy pets" and "therapy pets" are not covered by the same laws that TRUE service dogs are afforded.

UPDATE: Read the comments below. The ADA does not apply to aircraft. There are completely separate rules for bringing alleged therapy animals on flights within the USA.

4. The police need to look into Ronald Mundy Jr. and find out who gave him a letter or whatever claiming he needs this dog for his emotions. Did he order a letter online? Is he simply claiming its a therapy dog and hoping no one questions him? If he really did get a doctor to write him a letter, who is this doctor? Is it a dentist? Is it a therapist? What medical exams, mental health evaluations did this dog do in order to determine that Ronald Mundy Jr. absolutely needed to take this dog everywhere?

Ronald Mundy Jr.

5. What training has this dog had? Why wasn't it wearing a muzzle? If the dog does nothing but sit there next to its owner, it should have a muzzle on. It's not picking objects up for the owner, it's not doing anything that requires its mouth to be open. What makes the dog appropriate to bring it everywhere that you and I cannot take our pets, such as the library, on planes, in hotels, into restaurants, into the movie theatre, into the bar, into the grocery store?

6. Is it really a Labrador - Pointer mix? Because it doesn't look like one in the photo. Where did he get it? How long has he had it? What proof does he have that it's a Lab/Pointer mix? I believe military bases ban Pit Bulls from their on-base housing; does he live on-base? Why is this the only photo available right now? If he hasn't owned this dog since it was a puppy, what's its history? Was it surrendered to a shelter because it attacked someone or someone's pet? Was it aggressive so the shelter shipped it off to some "no kill" rescue? The police need to look into this immediately.

 

I am so sick of these fake service animals. Even if Ronald Mundy Jr. does have some emotional issues, you can't solve a problem simply by dragging your dog with you everywhere.

After all, people have had emotional issues for lifetimes. They didn't drag their pets with them everywhere 20 years ago, 30 years ago, 40 years ago. They took medication, they went to therapy. They got a friggin' rabbit's foot keychain or a Pet Rock and took that everywhere with them.

This poor man was minding his own business and because of Delta and Ronald Mundy Jr. his face has been rearranged by a dog that NEVER SHOULD HAVE BEEN IN THE CABIN OF THE PLANE.


Service Animal Defined by Title II and Title III of the ADA

A service animal means any dog that is individually trained to do work or perform tasks for the benefit of an individual with a disability, including a physical, sensory, psychiatric, intellectual, or other mental disability.

Tasks performed can include, among other things, pulling a wheelchair, retrieving dropped items, alerting a person to a sound, reminding a person to take medication, or pressing an elevator button.

Emotional support animals, comfort animals, and therapy dogs are not service animals under Title II and Title III of the ADA. Other species of animals, whether wild or domestic, trained or untrained, are not considered service animals either. The work or tasks performed by a service animal must be directly related to the individual’s disability. It does not matter if a person has a note from a doctor that states that the person has a disability and needs to have the animal for emotional support. A doctor’s letter does not turn an animal into a service animal.

Under Title II and III of the ADA, service animals are limited to dogs. However, entities must make reasonable modifications in policies to allow individuals with disabilities to use miniature horses if they have been individually trained to do work or perform tasks for individuals with disabilities.

Other Support or Therapy Animals

While Emotional Support Animals or Comfort Animals are often used as part of a medical treatment plan as therapy animals, they are not considered service animals under the ADA. These support animals provide companionship, relieve loneliness, and sometimes help with depression, anxiety, and certain phobias, but do not have special training to perform tasks that assist people with disabilities.

Even though some states have laws defining therapy animals, these animals are not limited to working with people with disabilities and therefore are not covered by federal laws protecting the use of service animals.  

(Daily Mail - June 8, 2017)

Related:




 
 












Saturday, May 27, 2017

California: Helen Woodward Animal Center holds special fundraiser for dog from Mexico severely abused by owners, then attacked by pit bulls

CALIFORNIA -- The Helen Woodward Animal Center of Rancho Santa Fe announced Monday that a special fund will support veterinary care for a 2-year-old Pointer mix that was severely abused by his owner and neighbors, and survived a pit bull attack in Mexico.

Named Dwayne "The Rock" for his steadfast strength and sweet disposition, the dog was rescued in Tijuana, Mexico and brought to the United States.


According to the rescuer, Dwayne's owner bound the canine with a crude wire muzzle, kicked him and beat him with sticks. 
 
After the owner was jailed on an unrelated offense, the dog wandered the streets, where residents disgusted by his deformities threw stones and scalding water at him, the rescuer said.


Dwayne was also attacked by a pair of pit bulls. He was left with a deformed muzzle that made his breathing labored, and injuries to his front right leg and elbow, skin and coat.


The dog remains good-natured despite his his ordeal, according to center President and CEO Mike Arms.

"This beautiful dog took all the despicable abuse and neglect man can show to an animal, and still he wouldn't turn on mankind,'' Arms said. "Helping animals like this is at the heart of Helen Woodward Animal Center. This is what we stand for and we'll do everything we can to care for him and protect him.''

People can make donations for the canine's care via AnimalCenter.org/RescueDwayne.


Money raised will be used to enlist specialists who can provide Dwayne with reconstructive surgery, according to center officials. They said Dwayne's injuries were so extensive, and projected veterinary costs so high, that none of the rescuers' usual shelter contacts would accept him.

Dwayne is currently living with a foster family, and will be made available for adoption after he is fully recovered, according to the center.


(KUSI - May 18, 2017)

Wednesday, April 20, 2016

United Kingdom: Police searching for person who threw emaciated dog into dumpster to die

UNITED KINGDOM -- A dog was dumped in a bin in Dundee and left to die.

The Scottish SPCA was alerted when a member of the public noticed the dog while disposing of their rubbish at Dundonald Street on Friday morning.


The male pointer mix was severely malnourished, dehydrated and was unable to stand.

He was immediately taken to a vet, who decided that the kindest and only humane option was to put him to sleep due to the severity of his condition.

  
 

Abandoning an animal and causing unnecessary suffering are offences under the Animal Health and Welfare (Scotland) Act 2006. Anyone found guilty of doing so could be banned from keeping animals for a fixed period or life.

Anyone with information is being urged to contact the Scottish SPCA Animal Helpline on 03000 999 999.

(Evening Telegraph UK - April 19, 2016)

Wednesday, February 24, 2016

New York: Cane Corso involved in jogger attack wasn't supposed to be at Red Hook home

NEW YORK -- One of the two dogs sentenced to death after attacking a jogger was involved in a previous attack and wasn't supposed to be in Red Hook, the Poughkeepsie Journal has learned through public records.

Gemma and Tank, the two Cane Corsos owned by Red Hook resident Jessica South attacked a woman jogging on a public highway on Dec. 30. They were ordered to be euthanized by Red Hook Judge Jonah Triebwasser on Jan. 27. State law requires humane euthanasia or permanent confinement if an unprovoked dog attacks a person causing injury or death.

One of those dogs, Gemma, had been involved in a previous violent attack, biting and injuring a local dog, according to a dog control complaint form the Journal obtained in a Freedom of Information Law request.

According to the Town of Red Hook dog control complaint, South's four dogs were being looked after by a dog sitter while South was at work on April 22, 2015.

Two of the dogs, Gemma and Blue, ran out the home and attacked an English Pointer being walked by its owner, who later filed the complaint. The dog suffered three puncture wounds from bites, one of which was to the dog's upper thigh muscle, according to a Red Hook Veterinary Hospital report provided by the FOIL request.

At the time of that attack, the four of the dogs living in South’s home were not licensed. South was given a notice to license three of the dogs — Blue, Diva and Tank. Gemma was “to leave on April 25” due to South having “too many dogs for the town ordinance,” according to the complaint.

A follow-up by the dog control office showed that South had licensed all three dogs and Gemma was no longer living in the home on April 26.

But according to Red Hook Town Clerk Sue McMann, information from the dog control office indicates South licensed Gemma at her mother’s house in Greene County. However the dog would often “stay with her while her mother was at work,” according to McMann — a fact that the town discovered after the Dec. 30 attack.

South did not return calls for comment.

In the case of the jogger, Judge Triebwassar ordered South to pay a $1,500 penalty, less whatever is to be paid to the victim as restitution for unreimbursed medical expenses, lost earnings and other damages.

“It’s an example of tort liability —  it’s negligence claim,” said Michael R. Varble, Esq. of Michael R. Varble & Associates, P.C., who did not represent South in the case.

Based off of the previous incident that had occurred, South “knew or should have known the dog have vicious" propensities, he said.

But South having Gemma on her property in Red Hook that day, despite having the dog licensed in another county, is strictly a legal issue with the town.

“There are two separate issues,” Varble said. “One of negligence, and the other is law enforcement. The dog control officer could presumably fine her for not complying to the town’s zoning laws.”

Judge Triebwassar placed an automatic 30-day stay on his decision delivered Jan. 27  to allow South to appeal the order.

(Poughkeepsie Journal - Feb 21, 2016)

Earlier:

Saturday, January 30, 2016

Minnesota: Nearly 50 dogs rescued from Carver County puppy mill barn; no charges being filed

MINNESOTA -- The Animal Humane Society in Golden Valley is readying nearly 50 dogs for adoption after they were rescued from a farm in early January.

The dogs - 23 adults and 24 puppies - were living in a hog barn in rural Carver County. Their owner had been notified months earlier that he was being evicted from the property but refused to remove his dogs and find alternate housing for them.

 

The dogs — mostly hounds, setters, and pointers — were left with nowhere to go and no one to care for them. Humane agents attempted to work with the property owner to find a solution, but an extended relocation deadline expired and a team from AHS rescued the dogs from the property. The animals were cared for at AHS in Golden Valley for 10 days while the legal process continued to unfold. They were legally released to AHS on January 15.

The animal control officer in the video said they're not releasing the name of the owner because they have no plans to charge him, even though he was running a puppy mill. Even though he "refused to remove the dogs and find alternate housing for them". He gets to dump his problem onto the shelter, get settled elsewhere and start all over again. 

 
 

The medical and behavioral needs of each dog are being assessed. Most of the adult dogs will become available for adoption in the next several days, while puppies will be in foster care with their mothers until they are old enough for adoption.

AHS officials say sadly, cases like this are not rare, Humane agents have responded to three cases and rescued 167 animals from unhealthy living situations already this winter.

(KARE - Jan 30, 2016)

Tuesday, May 12, 2015

Calvert Circuit Judge Marjorie Clagett says hunter who shot and killed English Pointer with a bow and arrow didn't commit animal cruelty

MARYLAND -- A Prince Frederick man was acquitted April 28 of accusations of animal cruelty after allegedly killing his neighbors’ English pointer with a bow and arrow while hunting on his property in November.

Dennis Taylor Hanvey, 46, insisted on the witness stand that, from his perch in a tree stand as daylight faded away, he had believed the animal he’d shot at was a deer — and that, furthermore, he thought he’d missed his target altogether.

If that were the case - that he thought he missed the 'deer', why wouldn't he go and check for a blood trail? A responsible hunter would not have left a deer to suffer with an arrow in it. A responsible hunter would have gone and looked for the damn arrow. This idiot knew what he was doing. He shot that dog and then got the heck out of there and left it to suffer and die.

Although Calvert Circuit Judge Marjorie Clagett acknowledged the suffering of the dog’s owners at the conclusion of the non-jury trial and said she had no doubt it was Hanvey’s arrow that killed their dog, she said his actions did not appear to constitute animal cruelty.

The defense argued that Hanvey may have believed he was looking at a piebald deer, which have a relatively rare genetic defect that causes them to be white with dark markings — similar to the white and brown English pointer, Abby — when he took aim and shot that late afternoon.

Hanvey was originally charged with animal cruelty and aggravated animal cruelty following the Nov. 8, 2014, incident — which led Abby’s owners to search for her throughout the evening and night before finding her the next morning about 30 yards into the woods behind their home, dead and covered in blood.

Amanda and David Marko, along with the 4-year-old dog, Abby, had moved into their rental home on Dennis Monnet Road about a month before the dog’s death, and had never met Hanvey.

From the witness stand at the circuit court trial, Amanda Marko described Abby as “extremely well-trained” and said that she was allowed to run free in the area behind the Markos’ home.

"She could wander anywhere if she never came back, but she always came back,” she said, explaining why she was perplexed when the dog did not return after entering the wooded area at about 4:30 p.m. “I never would have dreamed someone would be hunting that close to my house.”

Her husband, David Marko, remembered during his testimony viewing his dog’s body in the woods after his wife discovered her, removing her bright orange collar and following a blood trail about 200 feet to the tree from which Hanvey allegedly shot the arrow, which was littered with apples and corn at the base.

Deputy J. Buck of the Calvert County Sheriff’s Office responded to the Markos’ home on the morning they found Abby dead from the arrow wound, and told the court he had then questioned Hanvey at his home. When Hanvey admitted he had been hunting at the time the dog was out in the woods, his demeanor allegedly was nervous, his hands shaking and voice “vibrating.”

Hanvey said during the trial that he had been hunting from that tree about 200 times in five or six years, but had never before seen a dog in the area. On Nov. 8, he had not shot anything as light waned and his window to continue to hunt legally (up to a half hour after sunset) dwindled.

During questioning, prosecutor Frances Longwell accused Hanvey of wanting to shoot something, anything, and of wanting to allegedly “get rid” of the dog that was eating the corn and apples used to bait deer scattered around his tree.

Most tellingly, she said, Hanvey had not bothered to “track” his kill via the blood trail she said was obvious to anyone who looked.

Hanvey maintained that he had never seen the trail or any other clue that he had shot an animal, such as hairs, and that he had found the arrow “clean.”

(Gazette Net - May 6, 2015)

Saturday, March 22, 2014

Gardnerville man gets 6 months for shooting his dog

NEVADA -- A Gardnerville man who admitted shooting dozens of bullets and killing a dog that bit him has been sentenced to six months in jail.

James Skiman, 61, was taken into custody immediately following his sentencing Wednesday by Justice of the Peace Tom Perkins in Minden, the Record-Courier reported.

Skiman pleaded guilty in February to misdemeanor charges of unlawful discharge of a firearm and cruelty to animals.

“You picked up a firearm in a residential area, and destroyed an animal in an inhumane way,” Perkins said.


“Whatever is going on with you is out of control,” Perkins said.

Skiman apologized in court.

“I would never do it again. I regret having done it,” he said.

Perkins ordered Skiman to undergo counseling when he gets out of jail and forbade him from having animals, controlled substances or alcohol, or weapons while on probation.

In exchange for Skiman’s guilty pleas, a charge of possession of a firearm with a blood-alcohol content of more than .10 was dismissed.

Skiman said he was cleaning his .45-calliber handgun, when Banner, an 11-year-old English pointer mix, bit him in the face in an unprovoked attack in November.

Skiman was still firing the handgun at the dog when deputies arrived at his Rubio Way home around 9:30 p.m.

Reports indicated he fired 27 rounds at the dog, and at least eight bullets hit the animal.

According to the sheriff’s office news release, Skiman “wanted to make sure the dog was dead and continued to shoot the dog because it was still moving. He did not know what to do but wanted to kill the dog so it would not bite him again.”

[For some reason, after reading the original story I get the idea that this POS would get drunk and loud and belligerent and beat on this dog. This dog probably went crazy being locked up in this house with this idiot and went cujo on him. In fact, remember in "Cujo" when he's first getting sick and he's with the dad and his drinking buddy and they're loud and throwing cans and making noise and Cujo whines and gets up trying to get away from the noise? I picture it like this guy.]
A consecutive six-month jail term also imposed by the judge was suspended for two years.

(Gardnerville Record-Courier - March 13, 2014)

Friday, February 14, 2014

Deputy shoots dog, tells Animal Control to crawl under the trailer to retrieve it. They don't; dog suffers for hours as a result.

GEORGIA -- The Bibb County Sheriff’s Office says a deputy fatally shot a dog that charged at him Saturday, but Lucky was actually found alive that night and is now recovering at a veterinary hospital.

Lucky’s owner found the female pointer-mix under a neighbor’s trailer at the Skyview Mobile Home Park on Houston Road a few hours after the shooting, said Nikkie Brooks, who works with the animal rescue group Furever After Rescue.

Brooks drove Lucky to Southwood Animal Hospital in Warner Robins where she had surgery for her bullet wounds.


“She’s doing really good today,” Brooks said Monday.

Hospital staff sutured four wounds and removed a bullet lodged in Lucky’s body, said Caitlin Martin, a vet technician.

Martin described Lucky as being about 2 years old and weighing about 40 pounds. Lucky was shot in the shoulder area, but somehow the bullet did not hit any major organs.

“Everything was avoided,” Martin said. “I don’t know how, because it was right near her chest and lung area.”

Brooks and the hospital staff dubbed her Lucky for obvious reasons, though her owner called her Bama Junior before Saturday’s shooting.

The Bibb sheriff’s deputy who shot Lucky was responding to a call of three aggressive dogs barking and chasing children at the mobile home park, according to the Bibb sheriff’s incident report.

“I found myself cornered,” the deputy wrote in his report. “The dogs stayed aggressive, then one of the dogs charged as he got within a couple of feet from me.”

The deputy said he fired his weapon and struck the dog in the back. As the dog fell, he fired a second round into its side.

“The dog stood up and started towards me as I fired a third round into the side,” according to the deputy’s report.

Deputies were unable to retrieve the dog after it ran under a trailer, the report said, but Macon-Bibb Animal Welfare was called to remove the three dogs from the scene. There were no reports of any of the dogs biting anyone.

Animal Welfare could not immediately confirm Monday afternoon how many dogs were picked up by the agency.

Brooks, who was contacted by Lucky’s owner to help the injured dog, said she disputes the official sheriff’s office account.

“I don’t believe she is a real aggressive dog,” she said.

Brooks’ daughter created a Facebook page called “Prayers for Lucky” to share updates and coordinate donations for veterinarian bills.

The shooting was about 3:30 p.m. Saturday, but Lucky was not found until later in the evening. Southwood Animal Hospital said the dog arrived there about 10 p.m.

The sheriff’s office is looking into the case to make sure similar situations are handled differently in the future, Sheriff David Davis said Monday evening.

“Like any other use of force situation, if you’re being threatened with injury or someone else is being threatened with injury, you have to do whatever you can to neutralize the threat, and that’s what happened,” Davis said. “My concern is the follow-up as far as making sure that the dog was not suffering.”

(Macon.com - Feb 10, 2014)

Friday, November 29, 2013

LETTER: Don't trust pit bulls

CALIFORNIA -- For centuries, dogs have been bred to perform specific tasks (“Debate on sterilization ordinance,” Nov. 8).

A pointer will point when hunting birds, a Labrador retriever will retrieve birds and a border collie will herd livestock.

The desire to 'point' is instinctive to Pointers
These traits are not from training. They are from instinct that has been bred into them. Regarding pit bulls, they have been bred to fight and attack. This is an inbred instinct.

Border Collies herd livestock, but do not kill them
They can be very gentle family dogs — until something triggers that instinct. Once it is triggered, they do what they have been bred to do.

I have no patience with an owner who says, after his dog has bitten someone, “My dog has never shown any signs of aggression. He’s always been loving and gentle.”

A pit bull can turn vicious no matter how it is trained or how gentle it seems.

- Bob Backes, San Jacinto

(Press-Enterprise - Nov 27, 2013)

Saturday, November 23, 2013

Gardnerville man arrested after allegedly firing 27 rounds at his dog, killing it

NEVADA -- A Gardnerville man was arrested Tuesday after he allegedly fired 27 pistol rounds at his dog, the Douglas County Sheriff’s Office said.

James Skiman, 61, chased his dog out of his home on the 700 Block of Rubio Way in the Gardnerville Ranchos and allegedly fired rounds from a .45-caliber handgun after his 11-year-old English Pointer bit him in the face and tore his lip, Douglas County sheriff’s Sgt. Pat Brooks said.


After the bite, Skiman chased the dog out of his residence to a dog house and allegedly fired nine rounds. He then re-entered his house to reload his gun before allegedly firing another nine rounds.

The sheriff’s office alleges he then returned to his home to reload a third time and fire nine more rounds, for a total of 27 shots at his dog.

The dog was found dead on the porch of the home, the sheriff’s office said.

Skiman initially refused deputy demands, but eventually complied, Brooks said.

Deputies determined Skiman was intoxicated with a .112 blood alcohol content level, Brooks said.

“When you pump 27 rounds in a residential district, it was a little excessive,” Brooks said.

“Especially as deputies were arriving to the scene and he was drunk.”

According to the sheriff’s office news release, Skiman “wanted to make sure the dog was dead and continued to shoot the dog because it was still moving. He did not know what to do but wanted to kill the dog so it would not bite him again.”

The dog has a history of violence going back to last year, the sheriff’s office said. The dog had bitten Skiman on his throat, which resulted in a visit to the hospital and stitches last year. The sheriff’s office says Skiman [took] the dog after it reportedly attacked a 4-year-old girl.

Skiman was treated for injuries to his face and booked in Douglas County Jail on charges of animal cruelty and discharging a firearm along with resisting police and firing while intoxicated.

(RGJ - Nov 22, 2013)

Saturday, June 22, 2013

Ilfracombe dog attack 'ripped cat in half'

UNITED KINGDOM -- A cat was ‘ripped in half’ and another had to be out down after a series of reports of out of control dogs in the Ilfracombe area.

Police said within the past few weeks they had received reports of at least five separate incidents where dogs were off the lead, attacking other animals or dangerously running into the road.

The earliest account was of a sickening incident at South Burrow Road in Ilfracombe on May 21, when two Staffordshire bull terrier type dogs were off the lead and pursued a cat when they saw it, ripping the poor animal in half.

On June 10 at Foreland View a pointer type dog picked a cat up in its jaws, causing such serious injury the animal had to be put down.

The day before in Combe Martin, a dog described as a bull mastiff type chased a cat through the open door of its home and then bit the owner of the house when he tried to chase the dog out again.

Inspector Roger Bartlett said they had seen an unusual number of incidents within a short period of time: “We’re working with the dog warden to address each of the issues but we’re also seeking the support of dog owners to make sure that they do all they can to keep their dogs under control,” he said.

Tuesday, March 5, 2013

Milo the Dog Euthanized

MASSACHUSETTS -- After biting a second person over the weekend, Milo the dog was euthanized during the afternoon of March 4 according to animal control officer Jeff Collins.


On Saturday, the owner's 16-year old daughter, Ashley Bailey was attacked inside her home by the pointer basset hound and was transported to Hasbro Children's Hospital to receive treatment from the incident.

The teenager suffered serious injuries to her face but her current condition is unknown.

Originally, the family planned to appeal last Wednesday's decision by the selectmen to euthanize the dog, but has since given the dog to animal control and signed it over to the town, making the dog the property of the Town of Mansfield.


The order to put down Milo came in response to the dog's attack in January against a six year old boy who needed over 400 stitches. The selectmen voted 3-2 in favor of putting the dog down.

(Patch - March 4, 2013)

Earlier: