John Devita has named the city in the suit because he believes it had impounded the pit bull six weeks before his dog was attacked — when the same pit bull attacked another small dog in May.
The city knew the pit bull was dangerous and released it anyway, he alleges in documents filed in B.C. Supreme Court.
Devita's wife, sister-in-law and friend were walking their puppy, named Mila, in downtown Vancouver on a sunny Sunday afternoon when they saw a couple get out of a taxi with their pit bull, according to the civil suit.
The pit bull, which wasn't leashed or muzzled despite an order from the city, charged for Mila, prompting his sister-in-law Antonella Moscone to scoop the five-month old puppy into her arms, the suit alleges.
That didn't stop the pit bull, said Devita in an interview.
"This pit bull leaped, jumped on to my sister-in-law and grabbed the puppy out of her arms, and basically tore the puppy apart right in front of their eyes."
The three women tried to save Mila, "pounding and punching" the pit bull, said Devita, and were bitten and bruised on their hands, arms, knees and ankles as a result.
Mila was rushed to one, then another veterinarian-related, but four hours and $6,505.28 in vet bills later, she died of her injuries, said Devita.
Devita's wife, sister-in-law and friend are still in counselling after the attack, the suit states.
"It was literally ripping [Mila] apart ... they can't get that picture out of their minds," said Devita.
The dog's owners, Shannon Flegar and Ryan Patrick, are facing seven criminal charges related to the June 14 attack, including failing to keep a vicious dog away from public places, and allowing the dog to bite or injure someone. The pit bull has been impounded.
Pit bull attacked before
The pit bull had attacked another small dog on May 1, six weeks before the attack on Devita's puppy, and was impounded by animal control officers at that time, the lawsuit alleges.
Flegar and Patrick are also facing two criminal charges from that attack: Failing to leash their dog and allegedly allowing it to bite and injure.
After the May attack, the owners were ordered to muzzle the pit bull, but the city's animal control department should have sought to have the dog destroyed as a dangerous animal, the lawsuit states.
"You know, it could have [attacked] a kid," said Devita. "It's a vicious, dangerous dog, and the city released it."
Devita wants to see tougher rules, such as required muzzling for dogs that have a history of aggression — though he isn't pushing for breed-specific rules.
The lawsuit is asking for damages for out-of-pocket veterinarian costs, damages for pain and suffering, and other damages — but doesn't name a dollar amount beyond the vet bills.
None of the allegations in the lawsuit have been proven in court, and a statement of defence has not yet been filed.
The City of Vancouver is not commenting on the suit, saying it is before the courts.
The dog owners did not immediately respond to a request for comment from CBC News.
They are scheduled to appear in court in March on all nine charges, when there will also be a hearing deciding the pit bull's fate.
(CBC News - Dec 16, 2015)
No comments:
Post a Comment